Okay, I'll admit up front that my view of Baby Bush is colored by the fact that I wouldn't trust him to bring back the correct deposit on a keg return following a party. I don't expect him to steal the money, I just think he's an idiot (in the nicest sense of being an complete idiot and in charge of the most powerful country in the history of the planet at the same time).And, after reviewing my comments in the cold clarity of another beer, I think I'll stand by them.
In fact, if you substitute Baby Bush for 'Rooster' at the following site, you will have my opinion of Baby Bush in its entirety: Rooster Management.
But, let me direct you to this piece: 9-11 Cover-ups Summary.
Now as I said, I don't think Baby Bush is smart enough to plan something like this, I just think he's more inept than I am. But, look through the list, and decide for yourself which articles are incorrect. My personal favorite are the cites for the period covering July 4-14, 2001. They don't list the La Monde (owned by the Carlyle Group) article, but it was the first I'd seen of this story.
Anyway, there is enough stuff in the various stories in the media, that even if you don't believe a single one of them, together, they make for interesting ponderings. I believe that there is always an opposing faction operating in secrecy to overthrow any government. Historically this has been the case a convincing 100% of the time.
So, in my highest regard for the current usurper, I think he's a dupe. And, possibly Cheney is the acting Prince Regent.