It may not be the best definition, but I do think the function being performed by the contractors must be the criteria used to determine if they fit the definition of mercenary.
"As to the point of whether these 'contractors' are mercenaries, or should be looked at in a different category, let me add function to the definition and see if that moves it forward. Security is a military function, but it is a function that also belongs to the police and even to private security guards hired for sporting events,and what not.
A truly military function is to close with, engage and destroy the enemy. I'm not suggesting this is the only criteria to be used, but it is the most obvious. If the contractors are hired to close with, engage and destroy the enemy, then by all means they are mercenaries in the truest sense of the word. If their function is strictly to provide for the security of personnel and property, I think mercenary may not be entirely appropriate as a label in many cases.
I would not be surprised to find that there are some contractors who have been hired specifically for offensive operations, especially operations that we might want to distance ourselves from, but if this does exist, I would expect it to be a very small number, and the employers would not be traceable from the bank accounts back.
I, myself, am actively seeking contract work in Iraq, though my function will presumably be logistical planning and support. I am most certainly motivated by the financial incentives involved, however I would agree w/ some of the previous commenters that there is also that sense of camaraderie and adventure that is rare to find here in civilian life."[edited grammar and spelling]
I'd also point out that from what I know, reviews in academic journals outside of your discipline are likely to be especially brutal, because there's no need for collegiality--a history professor isn't worried about what a political science professor could do to his career.But after watching some of her performance on CNN at the 9/11 Commission hearings, I still think Kevin Drum's summary statement rings true:
This has more personal application for me: I think my aunt was Condoleeza's advisor on that dissertation. Aunt Cathy is no moron, and I'll fight anyone who says different. She's also pretty damn knowlegeable about eastern european military matters. And she's sure as hell no Republican shill--she's a loyal Democrat who served in Clinton's defense department.
Problems distinguishing facts from propaganda. Too quick to pass judgment without adequate knowledge. Failure to properly assess sources who have an obvious axe to grind. Ignorance of regional history.Sorry, what I saw today was not very impressive.
I've got a confession to make. I've got a big-time crush. I'm talking weak-in-the-knees infatuation. But it's not Brad or Orlando or Colin or any of the cinematic hunks du jour who have set my heart aflutter. No, it's Atrios and Kos and Josh Micah Marshall and Kausfiles and Kevin Drum and Wonkette. Bloggers all. Yes, when it comes to the blogosphere, I'm a regular cyberslut. And I don't care who knows it. Bring on the fines, Michael Powell!Hey, Arianna Huffington!! Since she has found 'Common Sense', well, she's turned into a babe.
Although I've only recently stuck my toe in the fast-moving blogstream, I've been a fan -- and an advocate -- ever since bloggers took the Trent Lott/Strom Thurmond story, ran with it, and helped turn the smug Senate majority leader into the penitent former Senate majority leader, a bit of bloody political chum floating in a tank of hungry sharks. Simply put, blogs are the greatest breakthrough in popular journalism since Tom Paine broke onto the scene."
Rice's selection of sources raises questions, since he frequently does not sift facts from propaganda and valid information from disinformation or misinformation. He passes judgments and expresses opinions without adequate knowledge of facts. It does not add to his credibility when he uses a source written by Josef Hodic; Rice fails to notice that this 'former military scientist' (p. 99) was a communist agent who returned to Czechoslovakia several years ago.In a probably stupid attempt to avoid being an obvious plagerizer, I'm not going to past Kevin' conclusion (so keeping my standing as an un-obvious plagerizer).
....Rice's generalizations reflect his lack of knowledge about history and the nationality problem in Czechoslovakia. For example....Rice's discussion of the 'Czechoslovak Legion' that was 'born during the chaotic period preceding the fall of the Russian empire' (pp. 44-46) is ridiculous. (It was 'born' on September 28, 1914.) He is clearly ignorant of the history of the military unit as well as of the geography of the area on which it fought."
A Pentagon source has said up to 130 US troops have been killed in fierce fighting in Iraq.I'm just wondering how accurate these figures are. Because if they are at all accurate, then let the escalation begin!
The large scale battle, described as 'intense', has taken place in the town of Ar Ramadi, 20 miles west of Fallujah.
Sky News' David Chater said: 'None of this is official yet - none of it is confirmed.'"
"...Some of the individuals to whom I am attributing a hostility to religion would resent the allegation deeply. They regard themselves as religion's finest friends. But what kind of friendship for religion is it that insists that the words 'under God' have no religious connotation? A political friendship, is the answer. And that is precisely the kind of friendship that the Bush administration exhibited in its awful defense of the theistic diction of the Pledge. The solicitor general stood before the Court to argue against the plain meaning of ordinary words. In the Pledge of Allegiance, the government insisted, the word 'God' does not refer to God. It refers to a reference to God. The government's argument, as it was stated in the brief filed by Theodore B. Olson, was made in two parts. The first part was about history, the second part was about society. 'The Pledge's reference to 'a Nation under God,'' the solicitor general maintained, 'is a statement about the Nation's historical origins, its enduring political philosophy centered on the sovereignty of the individual.' The allegedly religious words in the Pledge are actually just 'descriptive'--the term kept recurring in the discussion--of the mentality of the people who established the United States. As Olson told the Court, they are one of several 'civic and ceremonial acknowledgments of the indisputable historical fact that caused the framers of our Constitution and the signers of the Declaration of Independence to say that they had the right to revolt and start a new country.'..."And from further in the article comes this:
Needless to say, Newdow's objection did not disappear, because it is one of the admirable features of atheism to take God seriously. Newdow's reply was unforgettable: "I don't think that I can include 'under God' to mean 'no God,' which is exactly what I think. I deny the existence of God." The sound of those words in that room gave me what I can only call a constitutional thrill. This is freedom. And he continued: "For someone to tell me that 'under God' should mean some broad thing that even encompasses my religious beliefs sounds a little, you know, it seems like the government is imposing what it wants me to think in terms of religion, which it may not do. Government needs to stay out of this business altogether." So the common ground that Breyer depicted was not quite as common as he thought it was. In fact, Breyer was advocating the Lockean variety of toleration, according to which it would be based on a convergence of conviction, a consensus about the truth, among the overwhelming majority of the members of a society. The problem with such an arrangement is that the convergence is never complete and the consensus is never perfect. Locke himself instructed that "those are not at all to be tolerated who deny the Being of a God." The universal absolute is never quite universal. And there is another problem. It is that nobody worships a "very comprehensive supreme being, Seeger-type thing." Such a level of generality, a "generic" God, is religiously senseless. Breyer's solution was another attempt to salvage religious expression by emptying it of religious content. But why should a neutralized God be preferred to a neutral government? The preference is attractive only if religion is regarded primarily from the standpoint of politics...And, still further into the article, this:
Many modern believers, and modern commentators on religion, resent this. A recent historian of atheism, a Jesuit scholar, laments that in modern theology "religion was treated as if it were theism," as if it had no resources of its own to guarantee anything generally binding and true. But if religion is not theism, if its ground is not an intellectually supportable belief in the existence of God, then all the spiritual exaltation and all the political agitation in the world will avail it nothing against the skeptics and the doubters, and it really is just a beloved illusion. Others denounce the abstraction of the God of the philosophers, and the impersonality. Before such a deity, Heidegger demagogically complained, "man can neither fall to his knees in awe nor can he play music and dance." But this is not philosophy's problem, or even religion's problem, if by religion you mean something other than an excuse to fall to your knees or to dance with your feet. If the impersonal God does not exist, I do not see how the personal God can exist.In fact, I have been meaning to share my atheistic vision of existence for some time, but keep procrastinating. I think I will gin something up this evening for posting. But in the mean time, I suggest you go read this article. I hope not to continue my procrastination, though I may not publish this tonight because to present a well reasoned position, may take a little while. So, much for ginning something up.
U.N. Secretary-General Kofi Annan warned Wednesday a Rwandan-style genocide may be in the making in Sudan and said international military force could be needed -- a suggestion at once rejected by the Khartoum government.But, as I alluded to in the title, we can't help if something goes down. Our military is stretched so thin, we could spare the units needed to help. Of course, I doubt Baby Bush would want to help...well, wait a minute, Sudan does have oil.
The U.N. chief issued his warning in a speech in Geneva on the 10th anniversary of the Rwandan genocide, in which about 800,000 died. He left no doubt he feared something similar might be under way in west Sudan, where U.N. officials say 'ethnic cleansing' is carried out.
'The international community cannot stand idle,' declared Annan, who has acknowledged more should have been done to halt the orgy of killing in Rwanda in 1994. 'The risk of genocide remains frighteningly real.'
Annan said humanitarian workers and human rights experts needed to be given full access to Darfur, a western region in Africa's biggest country, to administer aid to hundreds of thousands of people driven from their homes, many into neighboring Chad.
'They need to get to the victims,' Annan said in his speech to the U.N. Human Rights Commission.
'If that is denied, the international community must be prepared to take swift and appropriate action. By action in such situations, I mean a continuum of steps which may include military action.'"
Five Regions of the Future. Joel Barker, president of Infinity Limited, Inc.,I haven't been successful in getting anymore information on Joel Barker's book, so I'm guessing it has yet to be released. Found lots of teasers for the book, and he seems very adept at self promotion, which is neither here nor there, just an observation. Also, I can't seem to locate a web presence for Infinity Limited, Inc., which seems ironic given how often is press releases mention the company.
wowed the closing plenary by introducing five regions of the future he calls
TechnoEcology. Different world views determine the technologies that are
emphasized. SuperTech stresses technological solutions; LimitsTech stresses
limits to growth and conservation thinking; LocalTech is centered on
community-based solutions; NatureTech takes its design cues from the biological
world; and HumanTech supersedes and surrounds the other regions and relies
upon breakthroughs and insights in human consciousness. His new system will
be described in an upcoming book, Five Regions of the Future.
Military applications for nanotech in R&D. Military applications of nanotechnology
will develop in three stages, according to Senior Futurist Richard Smith speaking April
22 at the WINFORMS 2nd Joint Symposium. WINFORMS is a DC area operations
research professional organization.
The three stages of development will be passive nanoscale materials, active
nanodevices, and active self-assembled nanosystems. Smith described current R&D
with military applications. The new Institute for Soldier Nanotechnologies (ISN) at MIT
will be staffed by 150 researchers at a cost of $90 million over five years ($50M from the
government and $40M from MIT’s industry partners DuPont, Raytheon, and Mass
General Hospital). The objectives of the ISN are to:
• Create a bullet-deflecting soldier exoskeleton
• Cut the weight of soldiers’ packs from 90 lbs. to 15
• Create clothing that can shield against chemical and biological agents and even
"heal" an injured soldier
• Create networked soldier health sensors
• Develop other innovations like night-vision contact lenses
Nanotech R&D at the Naval Research Lab includes:
• Sensors (e.g., fiber optic chemical and biosensors; high performance structural
• Materials (e.g., controlled release antifouling paint additives; machinable ceramic
superconductors; laser direct-writing process)
• Electronics (e.g., advanced silicon-on-insulator technology, microfabricated
• Optics (e.g., electrode-less high-intensity light source; portable pulsed x-ray
• Oceanography (e.g., high-resolution seafloor classification survey system;
localization of submerged lost towed body)
• Artificial Intelligence (e.g., machine vision for the integrated autonomous
At this stage, nanotechnology research isn’t risk-free nor intimidating. “Until we have
developed active nanodevices, such as “mechanical solvents”, the risks are not
substantially different from those we are already accustomed to—like asbestos,” Smith
said. In another decade or two, this may not be the case. Informed managers,
researchers and policymakers should begin now to consider what plausible dangers
might lie ahead. A logical first step, Smith said, is to study whether molecular assembly
techniques (MAT) are reasonably likely (as suggested by Eric Drexler), highly unlikely
(believed by many chemists and physicists) or somewhere in between. With MAT, the
prospects for revolutionary advances and frightening risks are far greater.
"Much is being written about Gmail, Google's new free webmail system. There's something deeper to learn about Google from this product than the initial reaction to the product features, however. Ignore for a moment the observations about Google leapfrogging their competitors with more user value and a new feature or two. Or Google diversifying away from search into other applications; they've been doing that for a while. Or the privacy red herring.I'm no computer wiz, but even I got a lot of info out the post. I recommend going to Topix.net Weblog and reading the comments from the readers over there. Very informative.
No, the story is about seemingly incremental features that are actually massively expensive for others to match, and the platform that Google is building which makes it cheaper and easier for them to develop and run web-scale applications than anyone else.
I've written before about Google's snippet service, which required that they store the entire web in RAM. All so they could generate a slightly better page excerpt than other search engines.
Google has taken the last 10 years of systems software research out of university labs, and built their own proprietary, production quality system. What is this platform that Google is building? It's a distributed computing platform that can manage web-scale datasets on 100,000 node server clusters. It includes a petabyte, distributed, fault tolerant filesystem, distributed RPC code, probably network shared memory and process migration. And a datacenter management system which lets a handful of ops engineers effectively run 100,000 servers. Any of these projects could be the sole focus of a startup."
The Supreme Court has agreed to hear Vice President Dick Cheney's challenge to a court ruling that would force him to disclose details of meetings between his energy policy task force and the industry.And maybe, just maybe, they'll be forced to go back to the original policy recommendations and actually cite their sources. It's the only time I've ever seen a 180 page policy paper,smack full of numbers and graphs, w/o citing a single source. Zip. Zilch. Nada.
The high court Monday accepted Cheney's appeal and will hear the case sometime after February, with a ruling expected in June.
Cheney has balked at turning over documents relating to the controversial energy policy task force that he headed for the Bush administration. A lawsuit claims he had made improper contacts with the energy industry when developing government policy.
Cheney is appealing a federal court's order that he release internal files of the task force. The White House has argued the courts and Congress have no business making inquiries, even limited ones, into the decision-making power of federal agencies and offices. Cheney has said executive power needs to be increased in such confidentiality cases."
"Nationally, developers, environmentalists and regulators were interested in the outcome of Newdunn Associates v. The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. As is its custom, the Supreme Court offered no explanation Monday when it disclosed it would not hear Newdunn and two similar wetland cases in Maryland and Michigan.In effect, this allows three lower court rulings to stand for the time being. These rulings basically come down as allowing the Army Corp of Engineers to regulate water ways, and anything that flows into those water ways including drainage ditches. It would be nice though to have a clear ruling from the Supreme Court on exactly falls with the Corps' authority, but for now, this is good news.
Conservationists and regulators are happy. Developers feel crushed.
The Supreme Court's refusal leaves intact an earlier decision by the federal 4th Circuit, which affirmed the Army Corps of Engineers' jurisdiction over wetlands - even lands that aren't wet most of the year or near major waterways.
Wetlands can be swamps or marshes, but they can also be upland areas that flood or have saturated soils for part of the year. Wetlands are important because they filter water and provide habitat for plants and animals.
The court's decision is horrible news for landowners in the 4th Circuit, which includes Virginia, Maryland and the Carolinas, said Douglas Kahle, attorney for Newdunn."
A decision by the Pentagon to increase the number of U.S. troops in Iraq is a reversal of its plan to steadily reduce the U.S. force level there.I don't know, but I think this is how it could start, a large military build up in Iraq. Call it a troop rotation, but only do half a rotation, and double your military presence, which would get you very close to the Gen Shinseki told congress we would need in post-war Iraq and was promptly re-moved for his candor and accuracy. Okay, the part about candor is editorializing, but it's what I believe.
[Photo caption from story: Senior military leaders gave assurances to troops and their families that Iraq duty would be no longer than a year.
By Gervasio Sanchez, AP]
Since the war began a year ago, senior military leaders have given frequent assurances to troops and their families that Iraq duty would be no longer than a year.
Now, those assurances have met the reality of Iraq, where military leaders are planning for the possibility that anti-U.S. violence will spread. U.S. troops are stretched thin around the world, and the Pentagon has few options to increase the force in Iraq if necessary.
On Monday, a senior official with U.S. Central Command said that the return home of about 24,000 U.S. troops who were scheduled to leave in the next few weeks would be delayed as their replacements arrive. Central Command's responsibility includes the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan."
You shouldn't have to enter anchor name tags manually, since your templateCourtesy of Graham at Blogger Support, who also corrected my major malfunction. And don't I feel like a maroon. I probably could have just read the instructions on the support page. But hey, instructions only help to save you time, and to make things work better. Other than that, they're about worthless ; )
should already include them at the top of each post. If you click the time
stamp at the end of a post on your published blog, you should see that it
will take you to the permalink for that post.
"In a rare piece on the subject in a major newspaper, last December as Saddam entered our offshore prison world, James Risen and Thom Shanker of the New York Times wrote of 'what has developed into a global detention system run by the Pentagon and the CIA...a secretive universe...made up of large and small facilities scattered throughout the world...Officials described the network of detention centers as a prison system with its own unique hierarchy, one in which the most important captives are kept at the greatest distance from the prying eyes of the public and the media. And it is a system in which the jailers have refined the arts of interrogation in order to drain the detainees of critical information.'Coincidently(if you believe in coincidences), it makes a great lead in for the post below.
Ah, those 'arts of interrogation.' You would want to keep them from 'prying eyes,' wouldn't you? And the Bush administration has done so with remarkable success. It seems that, for them, even Guantanamo is too exposed and so, oddly enough, that ultimate lockdown facility seems to hold no significant al-Qaeda or Taliban figures. They are held 'elsewhere.'
Around us, as Americans, the shadows have been deepening. They weren't first cast by this administration, but its powerful urge to scare us all into 'preventive wars' and unparalleled global domination has caused them to deepen immeasurably. Every now and then, as with Richard Clarke's testimony or in Fallujah recently, something in those shadows is, unexpectedly, sometimes horrifyingly illuminated, whether we care to exercise our prying eyes or not. Under an assault of almost unbelievable brutality, lit up last week was the semi-secret world of private armies in Iraq -- those four dead and mutilated men, working for a firm called Blackwater USA, part of a $100 billion global-boom business for which our government is the largest customer.
Just for a second, that business sat in the spotlit glare and we learned that the second largest force in our Iraqi "coalition of the willing" was not the British military contingent of 8,000-plus in southern Iraq but the 15,000 well-armed, well-paid mercenaries who protect everyone from U.S. and British officials to private business contractors. Some of them learned their skills under the old South African Apartheid regime, some under the brutal Pinochet dictatorship in Chile; some are Gurkhas from Nepal (reminders of a British colonial past), some islanders from Fiji, and some like the four who were dismembered in Fallujah had backgrounds in the U.S. Special Forces. As a legion, they truly make up a "coalition of the billing."
"Whereas to effectively implement such a response to terrorism, the United States needs a SMART security platform for the 21st century that--And, from there goes on to provide specific policy suggestions/guidance each of the five points, which make more sense then our current policies, in my opinion at least.
(1) prevents future acts of terrorism by strengthening international institutions and respect for the rule of law;
(2) reduces the threat and stops the spread of weapons of mass destruction and reduces the proliferation of conventional weapons;
(3) addresses root causes of terrorism and violent conflict in the Middle East and other regions;
(4) shifts United States budget priorities to fulfill unmet security needs; and
(5) pursues to the fullest extent alternatives to war: Now, therefore, be it..."
"The researchers positioned the arm about 600 nanometres away from a single-electron transistor - which acts as a motion detector - and coupled the two together via a capacitor. They then applied a voltage to make the arm vibrate and cooled the system down to a few millikelvin. Cooling the system to such low temperatures reduced thermal vibrations close to the point where just 'zero-point' quantum fluctuations remain. This zero-point motion results from the uncertainty principle, which prevents the arm from remaining completely at rest.
As the arm moved towards the detector, and then away from it, the amount of current flowing through the transistor changed. By measuring this current, the physicists were able to measure the displacement of the arm with a sensitivity that is only about a factor of 4.3 larger than the amplitude of zero-point fluctuations."
"``It's something you can't practice,'' said Patrick Miller, a computer scientist at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory and a part-time USF computer science professor, at midafternoon as the crew struggled with balky computers. ``You'll never find a thousand identical laptops . . . when you're begging and borrowing.''Okay, this isn't so much science related, as much as it points to the juncture of science, technology and politics: Bush Calls for Universal Broadband by 2007:
By the end of the day, FlashMob was a partial success. The crew managed to get 256 computers working together at almost half the speed required for the top 500 status.
More important, the organizers demonstrated that their idea for bringing ordinary PCs together as a temporary supercomputer isn't an idle college daydream.
Modern supercomputers are made by clustering together hundreds or even thousands of the same processors used in PCs, then unleashing the behemoths to work on hugely complicated problems such as weather forecasting, designing new pharmaceuticals and making aerodynamically efficient automobiles.
Supercomputers cost millions or tens of millions of dollars, putting them beyond the reach of almost everyone except government agencies and giant corporations.
If the FlashMob software can be perfected, a typical mid-size corporation or university could have almost unlimited supercomputing time by tapping its existing PC network on nights and weekends.
USF is making its software freely available, and researchers from as far away as Australia and England are looking to stage their own FlashMob events.
The University of Virginia built the world's third-fastest supercomputer last year by purchasing 1,100 PowerMac G5 computers from Apple and wiring them together. That was relatively easy compared with Saturday's FlashMob, because the G5s were identical to each other -- so no hardware problem had to be solved more than once."
"President Bush has set a goal of broadband access for all Americans in three years to boost competitiveness with other nations and create new business opportunities at home.Great idea, but just like the whole 'we're going to Mars thing', no follow through on how this should be financed, or even could done. That's a lot of cable to be laid in three years, and it's not like would be dealing with one company like the ol' Ma Bell, a monopoly that had significant power and political support during the rural electrification days.
'We ought to have a universal, affordable access for broadband technology by the year 2007, and then we ought to make sure as soon as possible thereafter, consumers have got plenty of choices when it comes to purchasing the broadband carrier,' Bush said during a recent campaign swing through the Southwest.
In addition to economic advantages of broadband, Bush said the technology could advance tele-medicine and distance learning.
For years, IT firms pushed plans to deliver high-speed Internet access rural areas not served by cable of digital subscriber line service, only to stumble in a thicket of questions, such as who would pay for the extension of infrastructure into rural areas?
Bush didn't raise the issue in his speech and an administration spokesman did not return a call seeking additional details."
In his remarks, Bush also criticized some lawmakers for attempting to block a bill that makes the ban on Internet access taxes permanent.I think trying to tax access to the internet is an absolutely terrible, and totally unmanageable policy. As more and more items access the net, like cars, and phones and toaster ovens, this would become a tax collection nightmare.
"We don't need to tax access to broadband," Bush said. "The Congress must not tax access to broadband technology if we want to spread it around."
"Reuters, March 31, 2004You better not be shootin' anything up my nose! KurzweilAI.net:
Scientists have completed the final analysis of chromosomes 19 and 13, a major step toward developing personalized antidotes.
Chromosome 19 has nearly 1,500 genes, including ones linked to inherited high cholesterol and insulin-resistant diabetes.
Chromosome 13 has 633 genes, including the BRCA2 gene, linked to breast cancer, and others for the eye tumor retinoblastoma, bipolar disorder and schizophrenia."
"NewScientist.com news, April 1, 2004And, please, please keep this out of the hands of marketers. My wife can go into an asthma attack just from getting the mail due to the perfume samples they stick in the magazines. Of course, it might be that this is not the way they are used. My wife is not alone in these reactions, and I can just imagine the laws suits that will result from firing the 'wrong' scent at the 'wrong' person.
A new 'air cannon' device can track an individual, shoot an aroma directly at their nose, and leave the person next to them completely unaffected.
Advanced Telecommunications Research Institute in Kyoto, Japan developed it for directing evocative smells to people exploring virtual-reality environments.
The device tracks the person it is aiming at with a camera mounted on top, which follows the target's eyes. Software on a PC analyzes the video images and controls motors that steer the gun in three dimensions. Once it has a fix on the eyes, it aims low to direct the puff of air at the target's nose.
Marketing specialists could seize on the air cannon as a way of tempting shoppers by wafting the scent of the latest perfume or an expensive blend of coffee in their direction -- perhaps in conjunction with in-store video ads. Or street poster sites could fire ad-related odors at you as you wander past."
"Such concern is escalating as more than 100 laboratories study processes involved in the creation of life, and scientists say for the first time that they have just about all the pieces they need to begin making inanimate chemicals come alive.
Unlike any other technology invented by humans, creating artificial life will be as jarring to our concepts of ourselves as discovering living creatures on other planets in the universe would be. It also would bring into sharper focus the age-old questions of 'What is life?' and 'Where do we come from?'
'The ability to make new forms of life from scratch--molecular living systems from chemicals we get from a chemical supply store--is going to have a profound impact on society, much of it positive, but some of it potentially negative,' said Mark Bedau, professor of philosophy and humanities at Reed College in Portland, Ore., and editor-in-chief of the Artificial Life Journal.
'Aside from the vast scientific insights that will come, there will be vast commercial and economic benefits, so much so that it's hard to contemplate in concrete detail what many of them will be,' he said.
But the first artificial life also is likely to shock people's religious and cultural belief systems."
"Occupation soldiers have clashed with Iraqi demonstrators marching in support of Shia cleric Muqtada al-Sadr, leaving at least 25 people dead and more than 150 others injured.Violent Disturbances Rack Iraq From Baghdad to Southern Cities:
In a separate incident at least seven people were wounded in clashes between US forces and the al-Mahdi Army, al-Sadr's militia, who seized a number of police stations in the al-Sadr City suburb of Baghdad on Sunday.
The al-Mahdi Army earlier occupied at least three police stations in the area, forcing police forces out of the buildings.
Earlier, Spanish occupation forces killed at least 20 Iraqi demonstrators and injured more than 150 others in the southern city of Najaf, reported Aljazeera's correspondent Muhammad al-Sharif.
Four occupation soldiers from El Salvador were killed and nine wounded near Najaf, said the Spanish Defence Ministry.
Some 15,000 of al-Sadr's supporters staged a peaceful protest heading towards the Spanish headquarters in the southern city."
"At nightfall today, the Sadr City neighborhood shook with explosions and tank and machine gun fire. Black smoke choked the sky. The streets were lined with armed militiamen, dressed in all black. American tanks surrounded the area. Attack helicopters thundered overhead.CNN.com - Seven U.S. soldiers die in ambush - Apr 4, 2004:
'The occupation is over!' people on the streets yelled. 'We are now controlled by Sadr. The Americans should stay out.'
Witnesses said Mr. Sadr's militiamen had tried to take over three police stations in Sadr City, a poor, mostly Shiite neighborhood of northern Baghdad named after Mr. Sadr's father.
Franco Pagetti, an Italian photographer, said he was caught in the crossfire and witnessed several American tanks firing into the ground.
'The tanks were shooting into the pavement, not at the height of the people,' Mr. Pagetti said. 'It looked like they were trying to clear the streets.'
Mr. Pagetti also said he had watched a group of militiamen launch three rocket propelled grenades at American Humvees but the militiamen had missed each time.
'The situation is getting worse,' Mr. Pagetti said. 'I saw injured people getting put in cars. The people said they had been wounded by American helicopters.'
As the fighting raged, Mr. Sadr called on his followers to 'terrorize' the enemy as demonstrations were no longer any use. Last week, his weekly newspaper, Hawza, was shut down by American authorities after it had been accused of inciting violence. The closure began a week of protests that grew bigger and more unruly at each turn.
'There is no use for demonstrations, as your enemy loves to terrify and suppress opinions, and despises peoples,' Mr. Sadr said in a statement distributed by his office in Kufa today."
"The chief U.S. civilian administrator in Iraq denounced Shiite protests in Najaf Sunday, saying the lethal demonstrations had exceeded the democratic rights to protest, speak and use the media.What stood out to me was this quote:
'A group of people in Najaf have crossed the line and have moved to violence,' Paul Bremer said. 'This will not be tolerated by the coalition. This will not be tolerated by the Iraqi people. And this will not be tolerated by the Iraqi security forces.'
Protesters opened fire on a Najaf garrison housing Spanish troops, and troops responded with return fire, a coalition spokesman said. Maj. Vicente Bizarroso said one coalition soldier was killed and 10 were wounded. Some news agencies said there were more troops killed, but the coalition did not confirm the reports.
Whether protesters were killed or wounded in the clashes remains unknown."
'A group of people in Najaf have crossed the line and have moved to violence,' Paul Bremer said. 'This will not be tolerated by the coalition. This will not be tolerated by the Iraqi people. And this will not be tolerated by the Iraqi security forces.'Um, not that this stuff is spreading, why are we assuming it won't be tolerated by the Iraqi people.
"J'Accuse', and leave it at that.=; Juror No. 4, a 60-something retired schoolteacher who went to law school in her 50's, flashed the 'OK' sign to the defense table, to signify that the brown paper bag arrived where it was supposed to (this is all on information and belief, and IMHO; I have no idea HOW Koslowski and company managed to get the juror to side with them-- maybe they even did it with their case; I'm just playing the odds). Manhattan DA Robert Morgenthau's office has already vowed to re-try the pair of corporate pig-whores.I like the Talking Dog's style, and we agree.
You see, when you steal over $600,000,000 from shareholders, and thereby help the Bush Administration along in its holy mission of destroying the Middle Class for the benefit of a privileged few, there are probably a few bucks left lying around to buy yourself a recalcitrant juror. It became obvious that Juror NO. 4 was not-- ever-- going to vote guilty, despite the firm convictions (as it were) of the other 11 jurors. Yes, that's what the jury system is all about: if she did not feel the prosecutor didn't prove its case, its her sworn duty to hold out for an acquittal-- regardless of the other juror's opinions if they could not sway her (nor she them)."
"The judge said he was required to give Olis a sentence of between 24 and 30 years, five years shy of the maximum, based on the massive losses Dynegy shareholders suffered as a result of Project Alpha's repercussions.Which outcome fills your heart w/ joy?