<$BlogRSDURL$>
Radically Inept
Wednesday, May 26, 2004
  A guide to 'good' speech

I was going to post this a couple of days ago, but I've been fighting bureaucracy (a valiant, but doomed effort) and a new computer ailment called "notepad.exe" TrojanDropper, or something similar. What a serious pain in the...Anyway, if you actually follow these instructions from Tech Support Guy Forums - [Solved] My notepad.exe has disappeared, you might do less damage than I appear to have succeeded in doing. [Really pay attention to that part about 'copy' and paste to]... 'Course, some of what I'm finding in the maze may predate this. Seems I'm missing files for Access, and a couple of other things, even though I'm trying to re-install from disks. So, stay safe.


Okay, Okay. To the point, also via lies.com - Cartoon Guide to Federal Spectrum Policy,
|
  I like Bruce and Terry

Though I'vve never liked Bruce Springsteen. In fact, I threw a portable radio-cassette-cd player through the screen in the hutch when one of my roomates put another 'Bruce' cd in. To really understand how little regard I have for the Boss, it was my $350.00 radio-cassette-cd player.

So, I like this much better The Not My Desk Somewhat Daily Journal, and specifically Nothing Having to do With Commentary. I like Bruce Campbell. Hope he comes out of it all with what he wants. Campbell, I mean...

Via lies.com
|
  The Singapore Navy had a sense of humor

Found this while waiting for super slow down loads from the county school system's server. But then, it seems like a lot of the web is slow...It's taking like a full minute or more to go between pages in their current opening section...I'm trying to get to the 'Ts'...

Commercials for the Singapore Navy: Television Commercials

This one, the one with rubber duck in the photo, is excellent. I got it as an email attachment, and it's pretty funny. Nice to see a country w/ a sense of humor. Of course, it was made in '97, and things might have seemed a little more optimistic at the time.

Right now, at the time of this posting, the feed is too slow and it breaks up half way thru. Might be worthdownloading to watch.

The entire website is interesting for getting a little idea of their culture and approach to defense.

MINDEF Domain: NSF

iMINDEF

This sort seems like the USO on steriods: SAFRA > About US > About SAFRA and

SAFRA - Facilities - Facilities at A Glance

SAFRA > What's Happening > Links

But the Navy's home site, ::.: Republic of Singapore Navy ::.:, didn't have working links when I went by.

Just sort of interesting...Do check out the rubber duck video if you get the chance and a decent feed. 
|
  William Taylor on Afghanistan

First of all, yes, I am a C-Span Junkie. I don't set out to watch it. I usually am planning to watch the Daily Show, or Sponge Bob, or something when I surf through C-Span 1 and 2. And, then I stop, only for a moment, but wind up missing whatever I had intended to watch because I can't stop watching a hearing, lecture, panel discussion, etc. So, back to C-SPAN: "Middle East Institute Panel Discussion on Afghanistan
The Middle East Institute hosts this panel discussion on the status and future of Afghanistan."
I point to this one, because Ambassador William Taylor, Coordinator for Afghanistan, U.S. Department of State is the first speaker, and he paints a very intriguing picture of current Afghanistan. Wow, this doesn't look like it's going to be much easier than Iraq. He states that the US is trying to conduct three missions simultaneously: 1) Disarming the Warlords, 2) eradicating the poppy crop and 3) Holding elections.

Well, it is an informative panel, but I get a little leery when most of the panelists come from some part of the executive branch, so at least catch Taylor's, and then watch as much as you feel like.

Oh, and just a thought, instead of thinking of Iraq as a new Vietnam, maybe we should think of it as the third Afghan like war. The first being the beating the Soviets took over the years, the second being we're still there (sort of), and the third being Baby Bush's War. 'Cause, I don't know, but the parallels to the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan and it's aftermath seems to be far more similar than the Vietnam analogies. 
|
  Iraq's future

Another C-SPAN program I want to recommend the Sen. Foreign Relations Cmte Hearing on the Future of Iraq.
The Senate Foreign Relations Committee meets to discuss the future of Iraq. Witnesses include: Anthony Cordesman, Center for Strategic and International Studies; Retired Gen. Joseph P. Hoar, former commander in chief, U.S. Central Command; Phebe Marr, former senior fellow, National Defense University; and Larry Diamond, senior fellow, Hoover Institution, Stanford, Calif."
It appears that once you are retired, or hold no political office, you can tell the truth at a committee hearing. This panel provided what I think is the most accurate assessment of the current situation, the current difficulties, and future difficulties. But, they also appeared to provide some reasoned advice on how to move forward in the process of handing the Iraqi people back their government for 'the first time since...1956(?)'.

Also, Chairman of the committee Sen Lugar (R - IN) and ranking member Sen Biden (D - DE) apparently can conduct a hearing that is far less acrimonious than most of the hearings I catch. They also seem to be looking for a way to succeed in Iraq, and not just bent on 'staying the course'.

Truly, if you want what appears to be a reasoned view of Iraq, you should check this one out. 
|
  Waterston as Lincoln

I'm going to direct your attention to something, and have no idea if you will be able to see what I'm referring to w/o watching a daily guide to S-Span, but the point is, if you get the opportunity to watch the taping of Sam Waterston reciting Lincoln's Cooper Union speech. It was excellent and worth the two hours time.
Casa Grande Valley Newspapers Inc. Lincoln's 'Right makes might' speech electrifies crowd 144 years later:
"On Wednesday night, Lincoln scholar Harold Holzer and actor Sam Waterson (of NBC's 'Law and Order' fame) embarked upon a modern social experiment of sorts: Could today's voters, accustomed to ingesting political messages in 30-second morsels, sit still for a rereading of the 'Right makes might' speech? Could they endure two hours of intricate discourse on an issue that's been dead for generations?

To answer that question, they invited the public back to Cooper Union, where Waterson, who's played Lincoln on television and the stage, would reprise his role as the 16th president. And the public was a willing guinea pig, judging by the long line of hopeful participants that doubled over as it snaked around the stout, brownstone edifice an hour before Wednesday night's free event.
It does start a hair slow.


Much as Lincoln reportedly had, Waterson struggled at first, straining to find his voice and unable to settle on a particular inflection ("It was the adrenaline," Waterson said later). The audience, perhaps stunned by Lincoln's long windup and with no assurances that they were not about to be supremely bored, simply froze.

But as the arguments took shape, carefully knit with strands of irrefutable logic and clever, crowd-pleasing rhetorical devices, the 2004 listeners began to stir. At first it offered murmurs and timid laughter at the subtle barbs and fitting parables. But ultimately, as Lincoln's assertions were galvanized one by one, Waterson was forced to stop several times, yielding to shouts of approval and rousing applause.
And logic like this, deserves to come back in to use in our modern political discourse:
"But you will not abide the election of a Republican president! In that supposed event, you say, you will destroy the Union; and then, you say, the great crime of having destroyed it will be upon us! That is cool. A highwayman holds a pistol to my ear, and mutters through his teeth, 'Stand and deliver, or I shall kill you, and then you will be a murderer!"'
Watching this, I developed a greater respect for Lincoln's oratory capabilities, especially speech writing and debate,and Sam Waterson as a performer.

I think Senator Robert Byrd (D-WV) is about the last of the great orator style politician we have. I've heard a few speeches he's made over the past few years on preserving and defending the powers of the congress, especially the senate, from Executive Branch encroachment.
As long as there is a forum in which questions can be asked by men and women who do not stand in awe of a chief executive and one can speak as long as one's feet will allow one to stand, the liberties of the American people will be secure.
On this I totally agree w/ Sen Byrd, we must maintain three strong, independent branches of government, or the Great American Experiment will pass into ignomy. My fear is that congress may have ceded to much power to the executive branch already. They look out of control to me.

Note: I think this may be the oldest reference I've seen to the word 'cool' used in such a manner. It appears Lincoln used the word 'cool' as we do today. I was startled when I heard Waterson say it, and thought it anachronistic and possibly a slip of the tongue. I had no idea that this usage of cool predated the beat generation. Maybe it just wasn't as common a usage? 
|
Tuesday, May 25, 2004
  Low blogging day

I've got at least four articles and two editorials sitting on my desk that I want to bring up, but I don't think I'll have much time today. Running all three dogs back and forth to the Avondale Veterinary Hospital for their annual shots and check ups. Then tonight is the usual Tuesday Democratic Townhall in Exile Night at Manuel's Tavern and since it looks like I'll be doing MARTA (Metropolitan Atlanta Rapid Transit Authority), I'll have to leave here by about 4:30pm and I usually can't Marta back before Mid-night regardless of what time I leave.

And, I need to stop by DeKalb County School System offices to clarify some application process questions. And, that's something I want to blog on too. Man, is it ever a confusing process. Well, next dog needs to go. Later... 
|
Monday, May 24, 2004
  Science Monday

As usual, a sampling of some of the science articles forwarded in the KurzweilAI.netnewsletter, unless cited otherwise.

How fast can you go?
KurzweilAI.net:
"Offering an example of this impact, Kurzweil forecasted that 'Once we have full nanotechnology-based manufacturing, virtually all physical products will have their value primarily attributable to information. We're not that far from that today (even without nanotech). The price-performance of all information technologies -- hardware and software -- doubles about every year, so that means 50% deflation (the same information/capability costs 50% less a year later).'

This trend reflects Kurzweil's 'Law of Accelerating Returns.' The paradigm shift rate is now doubling every decade, so the 21st century will see 20,000 years of progress at today's rate, he said. 'Computation, communication, biological technologies (for example, DNA sequencing), brain scanning, knowledge of the human brain, and human knowledge in general are all accelerating at an even faster pace, generally doubling price-performance, capacity, and bandwidth every year."
I got into a discussion over at KurzweilAI.net's Mind·X Forum with someone on the subject of the coming information singularity. My position is that it won't be a 'singularity', if the information rapidly disipates. I mean, if all of a sudden, we begin entering consiousness into machines, or cross over to other dimensions, or spead out across the galaxy, than there really won't be a singularity, because of the speed of diffusion and dispersion of the energy. On the other hand, if it happens that we are unable to dissipate the energy/information, well then, by Jove, we will have a singularity...My thoughts on it anyway.

New languages, and I can't speak the old ones
Semantic Web Ready for Phase Two: "Semantic Web Ready for Phase Two by Ryan Naraine:
The World Wide Web Consortium's (W3C) Semantic Web is ready for a new phase of development that will lead to the creation of new tools, languages and applications, the W3C's director said.

In the process, the Semantic Web will respond more intelligently to user queries.

The future of the Semantic Web dominated the discussions at this year's week long World Wide Web Conference. Tim Berners-Lee used his keynote to applaud the recent approval of two key technologies -- Resource Description Framework (RDF) and the Web Ontology Language (OWL) -- and outline a vision of building up and out from those foundations.

Berners-Lee, one of the driving forces behind the idea of giving data more meaning through the use of metadata (define), said the second phase will offer a time of 'less constraints' where many new tools and languages built on RDF will emerge.

He predicted a future where enterprises would adopt the Semantic Web and be startled by the dramatic way in which data can be collected and formatted in order to help humans and machines interact with information. 'We will see many new different applications and RDF and OWL will tie them all together. We'll see an extension of languages with variables and quotation.'"
I'll just have to confess to being out of the loop on this one.

I wouldn't like these odds
New Scientist: Tonsil tests suggest thousands harbour vCJD
: "00:01 21 May 04
Almost 4000 Britons aged between 10 and 30 may be harbouring the prion proteins that cause the human form of mad cow disease. The new estimate comes from direct analyses of human biopsies, and is much higher than epidemiological projections of the likely number of deaths from variant Creutzfeldt-Jakob Disease (vCJD).

The investigators discovered three infected tonsil or appendix samples from a total of 12,674 stored between 1995 and 1999. However, because so few positive samples were found, the projected total of 3808 can only be speculative. Furthermore, harbouring the prions may not necessarily lead to vCJD.

'I don't think too much should be read into our findings, but they should be investigated further,' says David Hilton, of the Derriford Hospital in Plymouth, UK, who led the study.

He notes that only one of the three positive samples matched the usual pattern of prion accumulation seen in confirmed vCJD cases.

The other two are different. 'It could mean these are false positives,' says Hilton. If they are, then the predicted incidence of the disease drops by two-thirds, from 237 per million British citizens to just 79 per million."


Nanobacteria?
New Scientist: Nanobacteria revelations provoke new controversy:
"Some claim they are a new life form responsible for a wide-range of diseases, including the calcification of the arteries that afflicts us all as we age. Others say they are simply too small to be living creatures.

Now a team of doctors has entered the fray surrounding the existence or otherwise of nanobacteria. After four years' work, the team, based at the Mayo Clinic in Rochester, Minnesota, has come up with some of the best evidence yet that they do exist.

Cautiously titled 'Evidence of nanobacterial-like structures in human calcified arteries and cardiac valves', the paper by John Lieske and his team describes how they isolated minuscule cell-like structures from diseased human arteries.

These particles self-replicated in culture, and could be identified with an antibody and a DNA stain. "The evidence is suggestive," is all Lieske claims.

Critics are not convinced. "I just don't think this is real," says Jack Maniloff of the University of Rochester in New York. "It is the cold fusion of microbiology." John Cisar of the National Institutes of Health is equally sceptical. "There are always people who are trying to keep this alive. It's like it is on life support."
Science in conflict. It does lend it a sense of drama, don't it?

Do you get a free toaster when you open an an account?
Wired News: 1st Nat'l Bank of Stem Cells:
"The world's first embryonic stem-cell bank opened in Britain Wednesday, breaking new ground in one of the most controversial areas of medical research.

The bank will store and supply stem cell lines -- strings of identical cells -- for research and possible treatment of conditions like diabetes, cancer and Parkinson's disease. Its store of cell lines is expected to number tens of thousands.

But opponents say such research involves the 'wanton creation and destruction of human life' and have condemned the bank as a storage site for dead babies."
Well, it's got to be better than an alley dumpster.

Found two more that are worth posting

On our way to Predator
Researchers demonstrate wearable electronics to aid health and fashion:
"Frederic Zenhausern, director of the Applied NanoBioscience Center at ASU's Arizona Biodesign Institute, is co-leading the project that sports both fashion and function. The ASU exhibit features two very dissimilar outfits that utilize embedded electronics and fluidics � one is a 'wellness' costume designed in the style of a personal health garment, the second is a camouflage military outfit. Both were developed to show how electronics and fluidics could transform clothes into smart biometric bodysuits that respond to a wearer's environment and vital signs.

"The era of wearable electronics for fashion and health is here," said Zenhausern. "The biometric bodysuit shows how electronics and fluidics can be incorporated into clothing to perform a wide range of tasks, from highly functional (like dispensing medicine, detecting pathogens or providing environmental awareness for personal safety and protection) to the aesthetic (clothes that change colors or display patterns as downloaded from a website to change the fashionable motifs and designs of a garment). This will be the standard of the future for interactive personal communication systems."

The ASU researchers call their outfits the Scentsory Chameleon Bodysuit, which act as a "smart second skin" through the integration of printed organic opto-electronics and integrated flexible nano-genetic devices on textiles. They enable real-time remote personal health and medical monitoring into multi-media and sensorial clothing."


Dark matter, dark energy, the dark forces are upon us
The New York Times > By X-Raying Galaxies, Researchers Offer New Evidence of Rapidly Expanding Universe by DENNIS OVERBYE:
"Observations of giant clouds of galaxies far out in space and time have revealed new evidence that some mysterious force began to push the cosmos apart six billion years ago, astronomers said yesterday.

The results constitute striking confirmation of one of the weirdest discoveries of modern science: that the expansion of the universe seems to be accelerating, the galaxies flying apart faster and faster with time, under the influence of some antigravitational force. The work, astronomers said, opens up a powerful new way of investigating the nature of this 'dark energy' and its effect on the destiny of the cosmos.

The astronomers used an orbiting X-ray satellite called Chandra to observe hot gases in the distant galactic clusters. By analyzing the X-rays emitted by those gases, they could calculate the distance from Earth and the speed of each of the clusters and thus trace the history of the expansion of the universe over the last 10 billion years, they said.
'The universe is accelerating,' said Dr. Steve Allen of Cambridge University in England, leader of the international team that did the work. 'We have found strong new evidence for dark energy.'

They announced their results at a news conference at NASA headquarters in Washington. A paper describing the work has been submitted to the journal Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society.

Other astronomers hailed the X-ray cluster method as a potential complement to other ways of investigating dark energy but said they would withhold judgment about this particular calculation until they could study the details. Most of the previous studies, including those that led to the discovery of dark energy, used exploding stars known as Type 1a supernovas as cosmic distance markers.

Dr. Adam Riess of the Space Telescope Science Institute in Baltimore, an original discoverer of dark energy, hailed the work as another sign of the new age of "precision cosmology."
 
|
  Science link failure results in finding this blog

Looks like this blog does a pretty good job of staying on top of science/technology issues: machinewatch - a wary eye on the convergence

And, it has some great links to other science related sites. 
|
  Games I like to play

I like Poker, Blackjack, Pool and NSDM. The latter is a game that teaches you a great deal about government. As they put it:
So, what is this game about?
The NSDM Game recreates real-world international crises of the present or immediate future. Ideas for scenarios are taken from current headlines and developing trends. Players take the parts of national leaders, dignitaries, ambassadors, military leaders, and political groups and are given the opportunity to try and solve all the world's problems.

At the opening of the game Controllers will select a scenario appropriate for the number of players present. Players are assigned places within a Country or Organization cell, typically representing major world powers like the US, Russia, China, Japan, Great Britain, France, Germany, Iran, Israel, etc. And organizations like the international media, the UN, NATO, and the EU. Available player cells change with each game, and not all countries are represented in each scenario. In some games countries will be played by Controllers.

Each player is assigned a role and a set of motivations and goals. The object of the game is to play your role well and to accomplish your assigned goals. In some cases players have conflicting goals, just like in real life. As a player you spend time negotiating with allies and enemies, making deals to gain you or your country more power, more weapons, more food, or a national chain of convenience stores. Some players will have roles which require them to set a national budget for the country they represent, in order to fund actions of the military, state, intelligence, research, and business players. Other players, both within and outside of your cell, may be working with you or against you in order to further their own goals. Your opportunities are limited only by your imagination and ambition.
Well, I played the short, 4 hour, introductory version of the game last year at DragonCon. Their standard game is eight hours, and includes a great deal of time fighting over share of the national budget. During the game you start to get an idea of how complex and chaotic things are/can get in national/international politics. In the game I played, I wound up playing the Secretary of State. I had a personal mission of trying to establish a 3 brigade sized, international emergency response unit. I also had a $billion that I had somehow freed from my budget to apply to this goal. During the course of the game, the Turks (in the form of one of the controllers) offered me a three brigade force for peace keeping in Iraq. Now, I turned the offer down, which may have cost me the game (I could have had my three brigades, and than used my $billion to bargain for some other goal), but somehow, I knew that letting three Turkish brigades operate in the Kurdish zone would have caused severe repercussions (in real life). The guy who won, the head of the CIA, arranged for us to secretly 'steal' a damaged Russian submarine off the coast of Hawaii, which almost got us into war with the Russians. He did it w/o the president or the Sec State(me) knowing about it. In fact, it was startling how little control the president has over the agency and dept heads.

The other thing that was eye opening, was have a controller walk up to you while you are in the middle of negotiating, say with the Chief of Staff of the Army, and ask, "What are you doing about the uprising in Sudan?" The first time something like that happens, you get a 'dear in the head lights' kind of look, but later you learn to look to the 'news' board, and you'd see NY Times is reporting a Sudanese uprising. And now you have to scramble for a response. Do ask the President what he wants to do? Do you just go ahead and make a statement? And, about the time you get moving on the problem, some controller walks up and tells you that so-and-so, president of so-and-so has been assassinated, or there's a coup in Brazil, what is your response.

And that's the thing, the president is trapped in an ever shorter news cycle, and has no contol over it (in the game I mean). News happens, you react, you have very little time to work on your own goals, and you aren't really in control of the people you appointed.

So, if you get the chance to play The National Security Decision Making Game, I highly recommend it. At least once. I found the game to be depressingly real, and best played by the cunning and ruthless - much like real life politics. I'm disappointed that they won't be at the 'Con this year, but here's the NSDM Con Schedule, maybe you can work it in to yours. 
|
Sunday, May 23, 2004
  Back to the common fare, conspiracies with villians

I listened to Larry Everest, speaking on C-SPAN2, but I can't find a link to it hereBOOK TV.ORG, nor at the Archives at the Commonwealth Club of California, nor even at his site Larry Everest, Author, but this is a summary of what I heardLarry Everest, Author: Oil, Power & Empire:
"This riveting and meticulously documented history of U.S. intervention in Iraq shows:

How the Bush administration seized on September 11 to consolidate a new global strategy of unbounded war for greater empire [?]

Why conquering Iraq is central to U.S. imperial objectives[?]

How the 2003 Iraq War grew out of over 80 years of foreign domination of the Middle East, yet also represents a radical leap in U.S. efforts to control the region[?]

How oil was a major objective of the war, not to fuel SUV's or reward favored corporations, but to secure a powerful weapon of empire[?]

How the U.S. is attempting to create an Iraqi client state, and why its occupation is spawning popular resistance[?]

How the Bush war juggernaut could be derailed[?]"
Sorry about the lack of a link to the broadcast, but it was a good program, and I had to agree with a lot of what he said. Not everything, but a great deal. Somewhere about the time he starts answering questions form the audience (and he might have done that twice, I was also reading the AJC at the time), he was telling a story about how he handles right wing criticisms and gave this quote as an excellent example:
"Saddam was put into power by people like you to kill people like me."
Which I thought was just a friggin' dynamite way to respond the next time someone relies on the 'Saddam was evil defense' for the war, and how can you be opposed to it?

He said some other things I thought with pointing to, but I was relying on finding the material, so no hand notes were taken beyound the above quote. 
|
  What can I say? A couple of different utopian sites.

Don't always want rant on and on about the evils of the world and US Foreign and Domestic Policies, so here are a couple of different items. Both of these seem, for very different reasons, to see a move toward utopian existance. I found this one, because someone had mentioned they had been in a course taught by Mark Woodhouse at GSU, and that he taught a course on conspiracy theories. So I looked him up, and found out he had this to say if you click on the linkat the lower right, NEW DAWN RISING:
FORMAL EXTRATERRESTRIAL CONTACT
:
"This briefing is intended as an overview. It neither examines the issues to which it gives rise nor attempts to weigh evidence in support of various claims. Since it assumes that publicly acknowledged contact is not far off (or has just occurred), evidence that extraterrestrials exist is outside its scope. Furthermore, the Star Visitors themselves will be in a better position to address in detail the many controversial and conceptually challenging claims contained herein. My sources for this overview (including myself) are numerous, varied, and fallible. Some of my claims may ultimately prove incorrect. No person credibly can lay claim to exclusive truth or to knowledge of the whole picture in this difficult arena. The 'matter of fact' style I have adopted for purposes of this briefing should be interpreted accordingly. Many of the ideas contained herein have been discussed both sympathetically and critically by other researchers. A few are relatively unique to me. However, since whatever truth this overview contains will be cashed in shortly after formal contact, I do not attempt to justify different sources of information. I have sought merely to prepare a document for the average reader that touches many bases and hopefully integrates an otherwise vast amount of information into a framework for useful discussion. A very select bibliography, touching on quite divergent aspects of this contact, is appended for those wishing to read further. I strongly recommend visiting Dr. Richard Boylan's website at www.jps.net/drboylan for authoritative information on many aspects of contact. Those interested in a comprehensive briefing prepared for members of Congress mostly around the question of evidence for current extraterrestrial visitations should consult Dr. Steven Greer's website www.disclosureproject.org. I also recommend the extensive documentaries on contact as presented by the History Channel as well as reports of the Paradigm Research Group and X-PPAC whose founder, Stephen Bassett, can be contacted at Disclosure2003@aol.com."
So, don't worry, trust the 'spaceys'. But, I must admit that I saw a UFO, which was labelled as a UFO by the by the militaries on both sides of the Berlin Wall and reported in both the Stars and Stripes and German papers, if I remember correctly, but in one for sure. So...And I kind of appreciate the disclaimer. Interesting touch.

On to the next site. I don't know how I originally stumbled on to this one, might be I thought anything with the title "Alchemy Journal" would have to be interesting, or who knows...Check out this article on another extra-terrestrial sponsored utopian transformation:Alchemy Journal Vol.5 No.1, Venus Transit of June 8, 2004 - A Breakthrough of Intuitive Awareness by Carl-Johan Calleman and Anders Bjarstedt:
"The Venus Transit of June 8, 2004 is clearly the astronomical event of the year. But it may be much, much more than that. The Venus Transit has always preceded great breakthroughs in human consciousness and played a very significant role in the Mayan Calendar. It is also a turning point in the Vedic tradition. According to the Indian avatar Sri Kalki Bhagavan, the Venus Transit of 2004 will be the actual starting point of the Golden Age, a process that will come to an conclusion at the next Venus Transit in 2012. This article presents the significance of the Venus transit on June 8, 2004 in its larger context and in relation to the Mayan Calendar.

To begin with, a Venus transit is an astronomical event where the planet Venus passes between the Earth and the sun ­ a sort of eclipse. Venus transits lasts for 6-7 hours and come in pairs separated by exactly 8 earth years minus two days. As far as human measures go such pairs of transits occur only rarely. Below is a list of the years of the most recent occurrences, where the second transit in the pair is given within parentheses:

1518 (1526)
1631 (1639)
1761 (1769)
1874 (1882)
2004 (2012)

Since there is no person alive today who was born in 1882 or earlier the Venus transit in 2004 will be everyone’s first such experience. What may we then expect from this occurrence? To find out it is certainly worth studying what happened in the world earlier in the first of these pairs of transits. We may then note that 1518 was when the first circumnavigation of the globe by Magellan/del Cano was launched (they set sail in 1519). The impact on the minds of people of this accomplishment was enormous. Through their journey these captains had shown in practice that the world was not flat, but spherical. In the following years a new world view emerged in which it was clear that humans inhabited a globe. The time of speculation was over and this may be said to have been the first step in the development of a Global Brain."
So, it's extra-terrestrial, just not living, I guess. Heck I don't know. I do think there is a trend toward increasing synchronicity though, and I see it in a lot of the cultural shifts in time, including fashions, fads, cults, and every day interactions. So...

I sort'a prefer my conspiracies to possess villian. It just doesn't seem any fun to rant on about things getting better through forces beyound your control. Oh, wow, something good is going to happen to me. Yeah, yeah, come on. Whatever could I find to occupy myself in a utopia? I don't have a clue. And if some sort of major transformation is going to happen, well hell, I guess I might as well enjoy the ride.

Anyway, I used to go to this great site that just listed conspiracy sites by type. You know, Masonic/Illuminati, Bilderbergers, UFOs, Republican, the Federal Reserve, etc. etc. It was a lot of fun, but I've misplaced the link.

I don't think the two sites above actually fullfil the definition of 'conspiracy', which requires two or more persons to secretly plot to commit an illegal act. Besides, how could we ever establish jurisdiction over the 'transgressors'?

But if you are not familiar with this type of literature, have fun looking at it and let me know if you get anything out of it. 
|
GEORGE W. BUSH - TOUGH ENOUGH TO TORTURE CHILDREN
Any subsidiaries, affiliates, officers, agents, or employees of any site employing compulsory user registration mechanisms are not authorized to access the content or services of this site.

ARCHIVES
02/15/2004 - 02/22/2004 / 02/22/2004 - 02/29/2004 / 03/07/2004 - 03/14/2004 / 03/14/2004 - 03/21/2004 / 03/21/2004 - 03/28/2004 / 03/28/2004 - 04/04/2004 / 04/04/2004 - 04/11/2004 / 04/11/2004 - 04/18/2004 / 04/18/2004 - 04/25/2004 / 04/25/2004 - 05/02/2004 / 05/02/2004 - 05/09/2004 / 05/09/2004 - 05/16/2004 / 05/16/2004 - 05/23/2004 / 05/23/2004 - 05/30/2004 / 05/30/2004 - 06/06/2004 / 06/06/2004 - 06/13/2004 / 06/13/2004 - 06/20/2004 / 06/20/2004 - 06/27/2004 / 06/27/2004 - 07/04/2004 / 07/04/2004 - 07/11/2004 / 07/11/2004 - 07/18/2004 / 07/18/2004 - 07/25/2004 / 07/25/2004 - 08/01/2004 / 08/01/2004 - 08/08/2004 / 08/08/2004 - 08/15/2004 / 08/15/2004 - 08/22/2004 / 08/22/2004 - 08/29/2004 / 08/29/2004 - 09/05/2004 / 09/05/2004 - 09/12/2004 / 09/12/2004 - 09/19/2004 / 09/19/2004 - 09/26/2004 / 09/26/2004 - 10/03/2004 / 10/03/2004 - 10/10/2004 / 10/10/2004 - 10/17/2004 / 10/17/2004 - 10/24/2004 / 10/24/2004 - 10/31/2004 / 10/31/2004 - 11/07/2004 / 11/07/2004 - 11/14/2004 / 11/14/2004 - 11/21/2004 / 11/21/2004 - 11/28/2004 / 11/28/2004 - 12/05/2004 / 12/05/2004 - 12/12/2004 / 12/12/2004 - 12/19/2004 / 12/26/2004 - 01/02/2005 / 01/02/2005 - 01/09/2005 / 01/09/2005 - 01/16/2005 / 08/28/2005 - 09/04/2005 / 09/11/2005 - 09/18/2005 /


  • Site Feed

  • Back to Radically Inept Main Page

  • Selected pieces cross posted at:
  • American Samizdat


  • Authors' Bios:
  • Somewhat accurate, no where close to complete
  • Photo
  • Rick Eddy's bio

  • Radically Inept attempts at shorts, and personal vignettes:
  • A Modest Proposal: A Solution to the Problem of Poverty in America
  • Wherein I confess my complete ignorance of 'common knowledge'
  • Learning from Mikey
  • I remember the Army...
  • A memory hole

  • Rick Eddy pieces:
  • Osama's Hair Stylist
  • Speed and Shorty come by for a visit
  • A rant and a Prediction
  • Rick Eddy on NASCAR and 'Bidness'
  • The continuing saga of Rick Eddy on The Temple of Doom:
  • Rick Eddy on the Temple of Doom (Part One)
  • Rick Eddy on the Temple of Doom (Part Two)
  • Rick Eddy on the Temple of Doom (Part Three)
  • Rick Eddy on the Temple of Doom (Part Four)
  • Rick Eddy on the Temple of Doom (Part Five)


  • The Dailys:
  • lies.com
  • MaxSpeak
  • pandagon.net
  • The Blogging of the President: 2004
  • Modulator
  • North Georgia Dogma
  • The Corpus Callosum
  • Drunken Monkey Style Blogging
  • Fafblog! the whole worlds only source for Fafblog.

  • As time permits:
  • Intel Dump
  • Orcinus Fair and Balanced
  • FuturePundit.com
  • Brad DeLong's Semi-Daily Journal a Weblog
  • Marginal Revolution
  • How Appealing
  • Chris C Mooney
  • Kevin Drum
  • Cyborg Democracy
  • Cursor.org
  • Iraq Now
  • butterfliesandwheels.com
  • Atrios
  • Talking Points Memo
  • Roger Ailes
  • The Panda's Thumb
  • corrente
  • WorldChanging: Another World Is Here
  • The Truth Laid Bear
  • Fables of the reconstruction
  • Oliver Willis: Like Kryptonite To Stupid
  • Kieran Healy's Weblog
  • Happy Furry Puppy Story Time with Norbizness
  • TheAgitator.com
  • Paperwight's Fair Shot
  • Lotus - Surviving a Dark Time
  • thoughts on the eve of the apocalypse
  • The River
  • Mind is Moving
  • commonSci
  • dr. menlo: promoting people over profits since 2000
  • Where We're Bound
  • Boing Boing: A Directory of Wonderful Things
  • NET POLITIK
  • Public Domain Progress

  • Infrequent, but worthy posters:
  • Rogue Analyst (My other blog)
  • CenterPoint - A Centrist Weblog
  • scratchings
  • Inspector Lohmann


  • Excellent sources of info:
  • Farmers and Consumers Market Bulletin
  • TomDispatch
  • KurzweilAI.net
  • Open Government Information Awareness
  • SPACE.com
  • Agnosticism / Atheism - Skeptical Inquiry, Freethought, & Religious Philosophy
  • Defense and the National Interest
  • Google News
  • TCS: Tech Central Station - Where Free Markets Meet Technology
  • ajeeb, News
  • Corp Watch
  • Center for Strategic & Budgetary Assessments
  • GlobalSecurity.org
  • Moving Ideas: Connecting You To The Progressive Community
  • The Memory Hole [rescuing knowledge, freeing information]
  • The International Campaign for Justice in Bhopal
  • -:| CHINA TODAY |:-
  • Alex Jones' Prison Planet.com: The Earth Is Being Turned Into A Prison Planet
  • Alex Jones Presents Infowars.com to Fight the New World Order --There's a War on For Your Mind
  • THE WAR IN CONTEXT:: Iraq, the War on Terrorism, and the Middle East Conflict - in Critical Perspective


  • Fun and off the beaten path:
  • GHOST TOWN - Chernobyl Pictures - Kidofspeed - Elena
  • Cooperative Extension Service (GA)- Publications
  • MEGA START PAGE
  • The Vaults of Erowid
  • Eyeballing Series


  • What I'm listening to:
  • Radio Paradise - eclectic online rock radio
  • Shameless plug
  • Big Rock Studio Technologies


  • Powered by Blogger

    Weblog Commenting and Trackback by HaloScan.com Site Meter